Homosexualist Zealots Attacking Mormon Temple in L.A.
What’s going on in California? Anti-democratic homosexualist riots are continuing. The people of California voted, and the people voted against the homosexual fiction. Are we Americans to riot every time a ballot doesn’t go our way? Is this a precedent we wish to establish? Mind you, America has just elected a far-left politician, who also happens to be our first black president. Should folks who disagree with the results of the Presidential election (whatever their reasons) take to the streets and violently disrupt society? Be careful. Yet, this is what is happening in California as we speak. The majority of Californians voted against Homosexual “marriage”, despite years of mainstream media brain-washing. Now, the homosexual agenda wants to take it out of the hands of the people, and have the case decided by an faceless judiciary. Just as important, and dangerous, is the violent attack made against religious institutions (some Catholics, mostly Mormons). Now, as much as I think mormonism is ridiculous, having a fringe group overtly attacking them is very frightening, and points to an increasingly violent, anti-democratic radical movement. They talk of “tolerance” and “discrimination”, and yet spew violent hatred on their fellow Americans, Democracy, and Religious Freedom when it stands in their way. I wouldn’t be suprised if the Totalitarians of the 21st century will be wearing Lavender jackboots. Article on Issue Article on the violent mindset of the rioters
**Video of Old Christian Lady being attacked by enraged mob of Homosexuals**
Posted like a true misandrist, homophobe, bigot, xenophobe. In time, even you will be humbled by truth, not your fears.
>”Are we Americans to riot every time a ballot doesn’t go our way?”
Yes. If the majority claims religion to be banned, you’d be the first protesting. If the majority wants slavery reinstated, you’d accept that? Of course not.
By the way, there is no “homosexual agenda” any less than there is yours, the Pharisee agenda.
@ No. 1
Of course there is a “homosexual agenda” implemented by Freemasons to destroy Catholic Teaching and Culture in “Western” societies.
The poor “homosexuals” are only used by them. In Hell at the latest they will know this and will know what terrible sins against the God of love they committed. Then it will be to late for them to regret. I pray for their conversion.
S: But, Sodomy is an infamous crime against nature, logic, and revealed truth. No Govm’t mandate would bind us to accept a gross evil. I am indeed a Homophobe. Evil things scare me. I am also a homocideaphobe, a car-accidentaphobe, a canceraphobe. Hopefully G. Bush will use his remaining power to sic the National Gaurd to quell this dangerous rioting.
“In time, even you will be humbled by truth, not your fears.”
The problem is, that people like Ken already ARE humbled by the truth (i.e. Christ). You just happen to mistake personal preference and emotional overkill for “truth”.
“Yes. If the majority claims religion to be banned, you’d be the first protesting.”
If the majority claims religion to be banned, Catholics will stay and pray. If the majority bans same sex marriage, gays and lesbians will stay and threaten people. See the diff?
Thank you Leo
Sadly, you are right.
I fear for the future.
Homosexual activists are totalitarian and against first amendment and against religion.
It goes way beyond tolerance and live and let live.
I’m a libertarian noncombatant in this culture war but agree that the gay activists have no right to have the state force their definition of marriage on us (and the black Christians who voted for Prop 8, and most of the rest of the human race for that matter).
Narcissists’r’us, or the mask has slipped from these whitebread lefty snobs: it turns out they’re really racists too.
Angry gay vicar in England: ‘F**k the n*ggers’:
http://www.standfirminfaith.com/index.php/site/article/17645/
http://fatherdavidheron.blogspot.com/2008/11/uneducated-blacks.html
Serge: I usually leave them alone, I don’t think homosexuals should be harassed, or anything like that. But, forcing society to go along with it (especially through the judiciary) cannot be tolerated.
Yes, it seems the deciding votes were cast by mostly black, and latino voters in California. The Libs didn’t know what to do! In their mind 1 “minority”, should help another. Now they rage against the “ignorant” (progressive doublespeak for “minorities”).
Thnks for speaking out ken. Every decent man I know cant understand the rise of this evil. We try to love our God and our wives – in that order – and speaking for myself, that takes a lot of hard work and self-control. Why create false *rights* in the face of the divine plan?
Quite a quodlibet!
The video is completely appalling. If there was a pro-life rally and the participants reacted in that way toward an opponent, the incident would make national news. As the annual March for Life shows us, however, conservative activists generally do not pull these stunts.
Loudly and viciously assaulting that woman and then stomping on the Cross of Christ – is there any better proof that those people are the direct enemies of Our Lord?
J. Smith: Indeed, the video is appaling. To make it worse, the anchors speak as if the “hatred” was 2 sided. A single old lady praying was considered the same threat as the grown men harrasing her. Stomping on the Cross just shows their mentality, they hate Christ, and the Moral Life He introduced into the world.
Correction: they were protesting. The “riots” that have been reported as fact by religious organizations are an urban myth. As usual, bthose who use doctrine base upon historical mth and superstition have reacted in fear: There were no riots in regards to any church- anywhere in teh US in regards to California Prop 8. Not in California, not in Utah – nowhere. However, have anti-social conservatives at these rallies shown their anger? You bet we have.
Freedom of religion means freedom from persecution and legislation by religious and non-religious persons and groups alike, regardless of belief, culture gender ethnicity or lifestyle choice.
The US signed the 60 years ago today. Article 2 from that statement:
“Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in his Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.”
I aspire that these right be held for all people, religious or otherwise. “Freedom of Religion” also means “Freedom -from- Religion” for those who chose to be “Free of Religion” or to chose their own path of belief and life. Marriage is a choice for everyone.
So you fear based zealots can be on notice, it will take some time, but we are working on the following to be submitted as a new constitutional amendment;
“Any adult person of sound mind may marry or be in relationship with one or more persons, regardless of race, color, gender, language, religion, ir-religion, political or varied beliefs, national or social origin, property, birth or varied status.”
Maybe not in our life time. But I pray for the sanity of all peoples such an egalitarian amendment becomes law.
Prosemo.
Not rioting? What is that picture?
Sodomy acceptable? Never. It will never happen. It will never be normal or acceptable. You can huff & puff all you want.
What did “The US signed the 60 years ago today. Article 2 from that statement”. What statement is this? Some silly UN statement? I piss on it.
Ken, I stumbled upon your site and, at first, was ready to bookmark it. But after having read some of your articles, including this one, not to mention your comment directly above, I realize that your language is not entirely reflective of Christ’s message. Where is the compassion that Jesus showed for sinners, such as Mary Magdalene, who went on to become a great saint, despite ostracism and ridicule by her contemporaries? Remember that ALL humans are sinners, including you and me. Regarding your list of phobias above, your homophobia is the only one directed against a group of PEOPLE, a group that you deem “evil.” Your blatant disregard of ANY human being is in itself evil, and is behavior condemned by Christ Himself. Instead of perpetuating Satan’s plan for discord among the Body of Christ on earth, you should strive to HEAL the injustices that divide through peace, humility, and uncompromising charity. That has been the role of our Blessed Mother, and it is one that we would ALL do well to emulate.
Joseph,
What hatred? The individual who suffers from this perversion is a being to be pitied and prayed for, and I harbour no ill will to him (or any person of this unfortunate persuasion). I certainly do not consider them “evil”. Also, thanks for saying I am doing Satan’s work. (Gee Joe, so much for not calling folks evil!).
My issue is with this queer “movement” which has congealed during the last decade, and which seeks to force the entire Western world to bow down to the idol of “tolerance”. This I (and I pray many others) will not allow this to occur.
It seems strange that your idea of “healing”, and “Christ’s message” involves total submission of others to your own ideals.